Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts called for judicial independence in his annual year-end report on the federal judiciary, calling it crucial for the judiciary system to maintain trust with the public.
“The Judiciary’s power to manage its internal affairs insulates courts from inappropriate political influence and is crucial to preserving public trust in its work as a separate and coequal branch of government, Roberts wrote in his 2021 year-end report on the federal judiciary, which was released on Friday.
Roberts, who has been focused on the court’s image throughout his tenure and voted twice to uphold the Affordable Care Act, did not mention President BidenJoe Biden Roberts calls for judicial independence in year-end report Biden to speak to Ukraine’s president Documents show Chinese government collects droves of data from Western social media: report MORE‘s commission on the courts, which has looked at restructuring the court by adding justices.
Biden has come under pressure from the left to seek to add justices after President TrumpDonald Trump Roberts calls for judicial independence in year-end report The year in weird: 9 bizarre political stories that rocked 2021 Michigan shifts, will follow CDC isolation guidance MORE nominated three justices during his term, including replacing liberal Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader Ginsburg Roberts calls for judicial independence in year-end report The top political books of 2021 Your 2021 holiday dinner political survival guide MORE with a more conservative justice. Trump’s picks were confirmed by a GOP Senate that blocked former President ObamaBarack Hussein Obama Roberts calls for judicial independence in year-end report 2021 brought security headaches — and worse may yet come in 2022 The 9 politicians who had the most impact in 2021 MORE from appointing his final nominee, Merrick GarlandMerrick Garland Roberts calls for judicial independence in year-end report The 5 most significant hits to our legal system in 2021 Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman discusses decision to keep some people on home confinement out of prison MORE.
Roberts did address a series of stories in The Wall Street Journal about federal judges considering cases involving companies that they or their families owned stock in. He said the federal judiciary should consider such matters seriously, but Roberts emphasized that the report suggested there had been few actual ethical lapses.
He wrote that the articles said that “between 2010 and 2018, 131 federal judges participated in a total of 685 matters involving companies in which they or their families owned shares of stock.”
“For most of the judges involved (a total of 83 of the 131), the Journal reported one or two lapses over the nine-year period,” Roberts said in the report. “Those sorts of isolated violations likely entailed unintentional oversights in which the judge’s conflict-checking procedures failed to reveal the financial conflict.”
Roberts also wrote that it was “inconsistent” with a federal ethics statute that requires judges to rescue in any matter which he or she knows of personal financial interest, according to the annual report.
“Let me be crystal clear: the Judiciary takes this matter seriously,” Roberts wrote. “We expect judges to adhere to the highest standards, and those judges violated an ethics rule.”
Roberts also wrote how judiciary leaders are taken steps to improve reporting on harassment and discrimination allegations, mentioning the expansion of the Office of Judicial Integrity and hiring of workplace relations directors in every federal circuit, the annual report noted.
“Nevertheless, new protections could help ensure that every court employee enjoys a workplace free from incivility and disrespect,” Roberts wrote.
The Supreme Court is set for an eventful 2022, with a key ruling expected on abortion rights in which some believe the court could severely restrict abortion rights.